
How "The Silence of the Lambs" Misleads You Right from the Opening Scene
I recently rewatched Silence of the Lambs, my favorite movie, for what feels like the hundredth time. It's an incredibly well-crafted film, with not a single superfluous detail, so I was surprised to notice something that seemed slightly odd — perhaps even a bit amateurish — in the opening scene.
Almost immediately as we fade in, an unnecessary super — or locator — appears on the screen, indicating that we are in the woods near Quantico, Virginia, the home of the FBI.
But why is it there?
It's unnecessary because in just a couple of minutes — even before the opening credits finish — it will become clear that Clarice Starling (Jodie Foster) is undergoing FBI training. We’ll even see a man wearing an FBI hat, calling Clarice to meet Jack Crawford (Scott Glenn), who leads the Behavioral Science Unit that investigates serial killers.
Also Read: 13 Silence of the Lambs Details a Normal Person Wouldn’t Notice
So what is the purpose of this obvious locator — displayed over a shot of woods — telling us we’re in the woods? And in Quantico, no less, the FBI headquarters, which we will soon understand, even if we didn’t know it beforehand.
Is this nitpicking? Certainly. But what makes Silence of the Lambs so exceptional — it's one of the rare films to win all the major Oscar categories — is how adeptly it reveals information, providing what we need to know without excessive explanations.
For instance, when Clarice is shown a photo of a nurse that Lecter (Anthony Hopkins) has attacked, we don’t actually see the image. Our imagination conjures a more horrifying image than what could be presented. This restraint in the early scene heightens the impact of the later violence.
So why does Jonathan Demme, who won an Oscar for Best Director for Silence of the Lambs, begin his award-winning film with what seems like a trivial, unnecessary detail?
Because the locator serves a purpose.
How Silence of the Lambs Creates a Brilliant Misdirection
The intent of the “Woods near Quantico, VA” locator is not merely to inform you of the opening scene's location. It’s designed to set up a brilliant misdirection scene later in the film.
Silence of the Lambs features not one, but two of cinema’s most remarkable misdirection sequences. The first one (spoilers ahead) is Hannibal Lecter’s escape from a Memphis courthouse, where he famously uses poor Sergeant Pembry’s face as a mask to gain freedom via an ambulance ride.
The second is the scene we’re about to delve into.
Firstly: Silence of the Lambs incorporates several locators. One could argue that none are essential. Some directors opt for context clues — like showing the Empire State Building to indicate we’re in New York — as it feels less obvious than overlaying a city name onscreen.
Yet again, the purpose of locators in Silence of the Lambs isn't to clarify — it's to mislead.
Specifically, it's to trick you at the beginning of the highly acclaimed, often imitated yet never duplicated scene in which we believe the FBI is raiding Buffalo Bill’s (Ted Levine) home in Calumet, Illinois. The editing is sly — as agents ring the buzzer, a bell tolls in Bill’s basement.
However, we soon find out that Bill is actually in Belvedere, Ohio, where only Clarice has tracked him down.
The scene misleads us by introducing a locator that indicates we’re in Calumet, Illinois — which is where the FBI team is located. But that's not where Clarice and Buffalo Bill are. They are gearing up for a confrontation in a pitch-black basement in Ohio, marking the film’s breathtaking and terrifying climax.
The locator has deceived us. The film has taught us through two impeccably crafted misdirection scenes that we cannot trust our eyes. We must follow Clarice’s example and look deeper.
Main image: Anthony Hopkins and Jodie Foster in Silence of the Lambs. Orion.
Other articles
-Movie-Review.jpg)





How "The Silence of the Lambs" Misleads You Right from the Opening Scene
I recently watched Silence of the Lambs again, my all-time favorite film, for roughly the hundredth time. It’s an exceptionally tight movie, with not a single superfluous detail, so I